Friday, 31 October 2008

Cycling into tomorrow: healthy, fast and environmentally sound

Bikes are the most environmentally friendly locomotion method there is. Yet, relatively few people use it on a day to day basis, at least if you compare with the amount of people taking the car. Ok, I’m not talking to the Dutch or the Danish here, who cycle on average somewhere between 600 Km and 1000 Km a year, depending on the studies. For most people in the developed world, the bicycle is not really seen as an option for our mobility. At most, it is something one uses for sport during our free time, or while sightseeing. But not really an alternative to the car.

There are several reasons for this. Laziness is certainly one reason for some. Others find they are too unfit anyhow so why bother trying. I suppose the text below has some good arguments that apply to these people too. But if someone does not want to be convinced, well, he or she will usually not be convinced.


So, I write this thinking mostly of those people who would use the bike, at least for some things, but don’t because they are worried about their safety on the road. I think also about those people concerned about the actual healthiness of cycling in a polluted environment and those who are afraid cycling is simply too slow to get them from A to B in time, and about those who are afraid their bike will just get stolen.


If you fit into any of the above categories, read on, because you will find that cycling is healthy, that in fact the air you breath in while cycling in traffic is cleaner than the one inside cars, and that the bicycle easily beats cars and even public transport in terms of speed.

I also put together some advice I got from different places on how to keep safe in traffic and how to make cycling more pleasurable, and to help make sure your bike is there when you get back


Talking of pleasurable, a little aside. I live in Belgium. People who have been to Belgium probably know that the weather here is, at best, changeable. It rains often. Yet, studies by Brussels City Council have come to the surprising conclusion that people who cycle to work get rained on just a couple of dozens of times in a year. I can attest to that. I seldom get rained on when cycling somehow. And that is nothing that a good outfit won’t fix anyhow. And this is rainy Belgium. Just to lay that one to rest straight off.


Advantages to Cycling


Health

Health is an obvious one. Numerous studies show increased life expectancy and better health for cyclists in young and old age. For example, in a brochure by the city of Brussels, Belgium, it says that 76% of people who cycle have hearts in perfect condition with the rest having an average heart health. 0% have a severely damaged heart. Non cyclists, on the other hand, have only 46% of people with their hearts in tiptop shape, 43% are average and 11% have severe heart damage.


Why? Besides the straightforward element of exercise, which is ever more important since modern life is less and less active, there is an element of relaxation and unwinding connected to cycling for one’s daily chores. To start, one is out in the open, and then there is also the pace, which is, in personal opinion, always more relaxed than driving. Or taking buses and metros for that matter.


But as it turns out, it is apparently also cleaner for our system.

One might think that cycling down a busy avenue would be a great way of turning our lungs black. But, according to studies, the air we breathe while cycling down a polluted avenue is actually cleaner than the air the people are breathing while sitting in the cars we’re zooming past. In fact, recent studies indicate that the air quality inside vehicles (and also houses and offices) is extremely poor. As a result, cycling through pollution is actually healthier than sitting in a car, with the air entry closed and breathing recirculated air.


The car is actually the main polluter of the air inside it. As a result the air inside a car is 2 to 8 times worse than the one outside. There are several reasons for this.

Outdoors, the wind carries the pollutants away, and at the same time, the cyclist absorbs less of what remains, since he or she is sitting fairly high up in comparison to the air vents for vehicles. This is important because pollutant concentration is highest near the ground (that is where exhausts are spitting them out and these pollutants are usually heavy).

Add to this that cyclists avoid tunnels and main thoroughfares (where the air is at its worst) and upon reaching red traffic lights can head straight up to the front of the queue, instead of sitting there in the middle of the exhausts. Numbers don’t lie and they are very clear. Your lungs prefer cycling. These average numbers I picked up from that brochure printed by the city of Brussels:


pollutant intake (μg) :

carbon monoxide

Nitrousoxides (Nox)

Benzine

Toluene

Xylol/Xylene

Bike

2670

156

23

72

46

Car

6730

277

138

373

193



So, for most pollutants, cyclists get between 3 and 6 times less exposed to dangerous particles than motorists.


Subsidies

A second benefit, that exists in some places, but unfortunately not in others, is financial. Some authorities, either national or local, give tax benefits or even subsidies for people willing to leave the car in the garage and go to work by bike (I think there are also cases in which the subsidies are given by the employer, which then gets some benefit from the State). Mobility bureaus and such usually have info on what schemes exist and how to participate. Sometimes organisations also have to get a heads-up for the possibilities that exist from their employees because the authorities don’t publicise their schemes adequately or sufficiently (hint hint ^_^).

The schemes do not oblige people to always take the bike, but instead have some way of adjusting the amount of subsidy to the amount of times the bike gets used instead of the car, or subsidise the usage of public transports and bikes directly, instead of the passenger.

The financial support can actually amount to a few hundreds of Euro, not to mention how much you save on gas (and doctor bills), so it is definitely a win win situation if the possibility exists.


Higher mobility and speed

Add to the above advantages speed and mobility. For short trips, which in major cities usually make up more than 50% of trips, the bike is certainly the best bet. Easy to park and fast to move about.


A big city often has average speeds for cars running around 10 Km/h. Cities such as London may go as low as 5 or 6 Km/h, certainly during peak hours. As term of comparison, a standard bike, powered by an untrained person, easily makes average speeds of 15 Km/h, especially if the city has the right infrastructure to accommodate cyclists and is reasonably flat. Even on a difficult town, speeds of 10 Km/h are easily reached, i.e., comparable to what you get with a car.


Therefore, cycling might very well be the fastest way to get anywhere within a 5-10 Km radius. If you can take the bike along on public transport (like the metro, something which is becoming more common, at least outside of peak hours), then the bike is probably the fastest way to get anywhere in town.



Safety in traffic


All of that said, while cycling, for the most part, you’re as safe as you make yourself. The things bellow are a sort of check-list meant to help stay safe while making use of your bicycle.


1- An important thing is having an idea of what your route will be and preferring the easiest, cycle-friendliest routes to the most complicated roads or big crossroads. A small detour is often faster than going through the main grind spots.


2- Take ownership of your space on the road. That cannot be repeated often enough.

The first tendency while cycling is to try not to hinder traffic. So you try to stay close to the side. But this increases the risks. Cyclists need instead to take control of their place on the road, for their safety and that of everyone else

Drive not right next to the side but rather about one meter away from it. This makes it much less likely that you get hit by an opening door, or that you are not seen by someone pulling out of a garage or a narrow street. It also avoids getting squeezed by cars passing you and not bothering to do a proper takeover. Many drivers have a very poor notion of the width of their vehicle and their speed.

Also, if there is a section of the road with more space (due to the lack of parked cars or a bus stop area for example), resist the temptation to veer in to make life easier for cars following you. It will just mean that you can end up blocked when you try to veer back in.


3- At traffic lights, move to the front of the queue and set yourself at the centre, in front of the first car. It is not for nothing that at traffic lights there is room at the front for bikes. Stopping there puts you in clear view of the cars so you do not get trapped when they start moving. Drivers then know you are there and what you are doing. They cannot avoid you if they cannot see you


4- Indicate well, and well in advance, especially if you’re turning left. Make sure to set the arm horizontally so it is clearly visible and that it cannot be mistaken for a casual gesture.

Peek back before indicating, and then again before turning, to make sure all is clear. One has the tendency to start relying in one’s ear to find out if there is traffic or not, or to assume drivers will let us through if we indicated, but developing a reflex of checking visually what is going on is the best way of avoiding accidents. Even discounting bad will on the part of drivers, which I have felt very seldom, they might have been distracted somehow and not have seen us indicate, no matter how clear we might have been.


5-When turning left, do not do it suddenly in one movement. Approach the left gradually, as you indicate, before actually doing the turn, so basically, prepare drivers for your move.


If it is dark, wet, misty, or simply there is bad visibility or heavy traffic on the crossroad, it is sometimes better to simply pull up to the right, and cross like a pedestrian, before getting back on the bike and continuing.


6- Trucks/lorries, cannot see you. In fact, for the most part, heavy vehicle drivers drive them half blind. After all, they have no middle rear-view and the side mirrors have huge blind areas, or areas where they only show images past a certain height. In Europe, there is a big directive being prepared to retrofit heavy vehicles with better visibility systems, from different mirrors to cameras, but that is still a bit far in the future. So, in the meantime, cyclists must always approach heavy vehicles with extreme caution.


Rule number one: no overtaking trucks on the outside unless you are 100% positive that it will not start moving. It is possibly one of the most dangerous things to do on a bike because if it moves, you will have no way of warning the driver, and very often you will not have the space or time to avoid the vehicle.

Also pay attention to the very important fact that a turning truck/lorry, or bus, juts out large sections of its body as it bends. If it turns left, for example, it will need a lot of space to its right to manoeuvre. So be careful to not get caught anywhere near a manoeuvring heavy vehicle. Better to wait and let it finish.

While talking of heavy vehicles, buses always have priority when pulling out of a stop, if in relation to a bike. So, don’t act as if they have to wait for you to pass, especially since bus drivers are on a schedule. Even if you are not on their blind spot, you will only be a very small figure on their mirror which they might miss in their hurry.


7- When there are queues, in places without a cycle path, it is often safer, ironically enough, to cycle in the middle of the road, between the two lanes.

This has the advantage of making yourself visible to oncoming traffic, but also making you more visible to the traffic in your lane.

If you cycle between the two lanes, you will be coming in on the driver’s side, which is the side drivers check the most on their side mirrors.

Then, when the queue starts moving again, you can (and should) easily slide into a gap again, and you will do so remaining perfectly visible to all drivers. That said, if the traffic in opposite direction is heavy or you are going to turn right, or the road is very narrow, it might be safer to stick to the sides of the road. Check next point then.


8- Be extremely careful, and move slowly if you are cycling past a queue on the outside of the lane. Do stop and take your place in the queue if there is not enough space, and do not try to squeeze through gaps, especially if you are not sure the drivers have seen you. You could get trapped when the queue starts moving, because cars do not always move in straight line.

The problem with cycling on the outside of the road is that this is the side drivers tend to check the least on their side mirrors, not to mention the side with the largest blind spots.

It is also the side passengers get off, often without checking for cyclists. And, once the traffic starts moving, one can get easily trapped between the traffic and the parked cars, hit mirrors, etc.

If there is a bicycle lane, it is perfectly safe, of course.


9- On roundabouts, stick to the middle of the outside lane, or as far in as the cycle path if allows, if there is one. This decreases the likelihood of getting cars cutting you off on the way out of the roundabout. It is, nonetheless, a particularly tricky type of road for cyclists, so be extra visible, extra careful, and extra clear indicating what you’re going to do.


10- In many cities, bikes are allowed to ignore most one-way signs and cycle against the flow of traffic down one-way streets. This is great to save time, but it does involve extra risks because you will be taking people by surprise. They will not expect anything to be coming from that side and therefore will not pay attention. Since bikes are silent, they often have no idea the cyclist is there. So, extra care in crossroads, when passing garages and when going past pedestrians.


11- Trams are nice in a city, I find personally. They have a certain charm to them. But their rails are hell for cyclists. The only thing to do is to cross them at a low speed on as perpendicular an angle as you can and the road and traffic allows. Otherwise there is a real risk of sliding (even in dry weather) or getting a wheel caught.


12- You went shopping and you are carrying a couple of bags on your bike. Try to bear in mind that this will extend your braking distance, unbalance your bike if you’re manoeuvring, and simply just make your bike harder to manage.


13- And, last but not least, dress colourfully, or at least, do not dress too discreetly. A cyclist is a small volume on the road, meaning that since we do not stick out because of our size and shape, we must find other ways to do it. Colour, is the easiest. Another option, especially for the evening is lights and reflectors. Most of these things are quite cheap to buy, and sometimes you might even get them for free from employers, authorities, festivals, etc.


Avoiding theft


Just one final word about theft. That is indeed a big problem in some towns, but not an insurmountable one. A friend of mine had the following philosophy: “the best is to have two really good locks and one really beaten up old bike.”


I tend to agree, at least in part. If you want to use a bike to just get around town for work, to do grocery shopping or go out to meet up with friends, you certainly do not need something really racy right? Ask the Dutch. They cycle everywhere, and most of their bikes seem to date back to World War One.


That said, old bike or new bike, you still want it to be there when you come back.

So, first thing is to get two good locks. One is not enough, and you cannot just use whatever is cheapest either.


A good thing to have is a ring lock (which is embedded into the frame and jams a ring through the spokes of the back wheel). It seems those are hell to break.

That said, they do not fix your bike to anything, so someone can just ‘carry’ it away literally and work on it calmly out of sight. It is something handy to have, but not a must.


What you absolutely need is a sturdy U-lock. These are difficult to break or cut through and allow some flexibility regarding where you fix your bike.

Alternatively you can use a resistant chain with a key lock, but I think these are easier to break. On the other hand, they do give you more flexibility when it comes to choosing something to fix the bike to. Other types of locks, like spiral locks only take a few seconds to break. Locks that open with a combination instead of a key also tend to be easy to break, from what I hear and read.


You then need to use one lock between the frame and the front wheel, and another between the frame and the back wheel. At least one of the two should also fix to something solid, like a fence, or a lighting post. This way you protect the bike, and both of the wheels (since in some places the wheels sometimes get stolen, to be sold on).

It is important to also choose wisely what you attach the bike to. No point in having great locks o go and attach them to a rusty fence that gets loose or breaks the minute anyone bothers to shake it. It is also best to park the bike in a place where there is movement of people, of course.

Wednesday, 15 October 2008

European vote: Time for urgent action

There is a battle being fought, right now, in Europe.

After the European Union's pledge to cut emission by 20%, on what has been known as the 20-20-20 package (20% less emissions, 20% renewables energies, 20% less usage of primary energy by 2020), the European Commission approved a pledge to increase all of this to 30% if there was a comprehensive agreement on after Kyoto including all the main polluters in the world (including developing countries).

This did not mean the Europeans want everybody to make the same sort of cuts necessarily, but that if there is a decent agreement on cuts for big rich polluters and stabilizing the emissions on growing underdeveloped big polluters (of course, we're talking here in particular China, India, and a couple of other big developing powers like Brazil for example), Europe will up its commitment and make a bigger effort in cleaning up its own act, well beyond anyone else's.

Now, the European Parliament's Environment Committee has managed to adopt the energy and environmental package proposed by the Commission underlying these pledges, maintaining most of the package, despite heavy industry lobbying to water down the whole thing.

But now the whole process comes to the really big battle, namely, approval at the European Council, where lobbying has been particularly fierce and positions tend to be more pro-industry.

For those of you least accustomed to the European decision process here it is in a nutshell: the European Commission makes a proposal, which then goes to the European Council (which is basically where the government of each member-state is represented, and which holds the strings to the purse, because the member-states decide how much money to transfer to the European Institutions and programs). The Council makes all sorts of amendments, usually after a play of national interests, which, to be honest, sometimes is a bit sickening, and sends the amended proposal to the European Parliament.
The Parliament then can adopt the Council's text or it can amend the proposal (at least in most policy areas), and the thing gets sent back to the Council. The Council then checks out what the Parliament says, may accept it as is or make a new set of changes and sends it back to the Parliament again.
And again, the Parliament can adopt or not. If it does not, then the whole thing goes into a sort of concentrated negotiation into the night called conciliation and hopefully an agreement is reached.
If no agreement is reached, the whole thing falls and they either forget it for a while, or the Commission starts working on a completely new approach on the subject, which it will later submit again.

So, what is happening at this moment is that we are in the middle of the first stage. The parliament has voted the energy and environment package, reverting more or less to what the Commission had originally proposed.
But it looks as if the European Summit in its meeting starting today (15/10/2008), namely some countries in there which have a lot of heavy industry and figure will not get hit too hard by global warming, want to scrap most of the more interesting parts of the package, get unnoficially rid of the pledge to automatically upgrade the promised cuts in emissions to 30% by replacing it with a heavyly bureaucratic method, and offer big polluting industry a load of free money on a platter.
Yes, those guys making a bundle of money out of all of us under the pretext of high energy prices, at the same time as they continue destroying our world, would get a load of emissions rights for free, which they then can sell on and make money on, or can keep and save money but not investing in improving their emissions profiles. Whatever the heads of government agree on during thise Summit will set the scene for the Council's position.

The most ironic is that they are doing it under the pretext of the financial meltdown, trying to say that global warming is not as urgent as the financial crisis and that they can force an ambitious package at a moment of crisis.

So the greed of financial fatcats gives polluting fatcats the excuse to continue being greedy with the blessing of their politician little helpers, who no doubt will end up on their management boards soon after retiring politics.

But all of this is of course done solely with our benefit in mind, they would argue, so they can concentrate in keeping the world safe from economic disaster for common people like you and me.
Does anyone buy it?

So, I know there is only so much each one of us can do to interfere in politics (funny I should have to say this considering we are supposed to live under democracy), but whatever we can do, we should do.
Especially because if the Council keeps on holding a pro-industry perspective it can say 'Agree or get nothing'. After all, it can just ignore the Parliament and the Commission's views, let things get bogged down and the whole proposal will fall during conciliation, i.e. no mandatory cuts at all. Exactly what some want

So, here's a link which might help at least make it easier to put pressure on the Council. Here, you get most of the work done on sending emails to your heads of government, to at least put pressure on them, so they feel that they have to do (at least part of) the right thing.

http://www.avaaz.org/en/europe_climate_summit/?cl=137967993&v=2287

The time is short but a flood of emails and calls is absolutely required to minimise the risk that the type of changes and damage to the package that Big Business wants gets pushed through at Council and imposed on the Parliament and the Commission. So, spread it around.